2014 Rolls-royce Phantom
The Verdict
The 2014 Rolls-royce Phantom has 1 owner complaints filed with NHTSA. The most reported issue is body (1 complaints). With a Klunk Score of 100/100, it earns a "Smooth Ride" rating.
This is the cleanest year on record. Nice pick.
Klunk Score: Smooth Ride
This vehicle year has significantly fewer complaints than average. A reliable choice.
How is this calculated?
The Klunk Score ranks this vehicle year against all others in our database based on total owner complaints filed with NHTSA. 100 = fewest complaints (top tier), 0 = most complained-about. Scores above 60 are better than average; below 40 means more problems than most.
Get notified if a recall hits this car.
We email you when NHTSA issues a new recall on the 2014 Rolls-royce Phantom. No spam, no marketing.
Under the Hood
Each number is a complaint. Darker = bigger problem.
By Category
By Severity
Worst Problems
Complaints
2014 I PURCHASED THE VEHICLE FROM PAUL MILLER ROLLS ROYCE IN NEW JERSEY. 2016 THE RIGHT PASSENGER WINDOW FRACTURED ON ITS OWN. NOT CAUSED BY IMPACT. PAUL MILLER REPLACED WINDOW UNDER WARRANTY. 2017 THE RIGHT PASSENGER WINDOW FRACTURED AGAIN ON ITS OWN. NOT CAUSED BY IMPACT. PAUL MILLER REPLACED THE WINDOW UNDER WARRANTY. 2019 I MOVED TO MIAMI BEACH, FL WITH THE VEHICLE. 2021 THE RIGHT PASSENGER WINDOW FRACTURED AGAIN ON ITS OWN. NOT CAUSED BY IMPACT. I BROUGHT THE CAR TO BRAMAN MIAMI ROLLS ROYCE. THEY DECLINED TO REPLACE THE WINDOW UNDER WARRANTY. RICKY WILDNER FROM BRAMAN STATED THAT THE LOCAL ROLLS ROYCE REPRESENTATIVE OFFERED A DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $5500 TO REPLACE THE WINDOW. HE FURTHER STATED THAT THE FRACTURE MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY STORAGE IN FLORIDA HEAT. MATTHEW BOYER FROM BRAMAN STATED THAT HE FORMERLY WORKED FOR ROLL ROYCE MOTOR CAR AND THIS PROBLEM HAS NEVER OCCURED IN THIS MODEL. REPLACING THE WINDOW WITHOUT ADDRESSING THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM IS FUTILE. CONSIDERING THAT THE SAME WINDOW HAS BROKEN IN THE IDENTICAL MANNER 3 TIMES WITH NO IMPACT, EVEN IF I PAY TO REPLACE THE WINDOW, IT WILL LIKELY FRACTURE IN THE SAME MANNER AGAIN. I BELIEVE THAT IT IS LIKELY THAT THE DEFECT THAT CAUSED THE WINDOW TO FRACTURE IN SAME MANNER 3 TIMES IS A SIGNIFICANT SAFETY HAZARD. IT IS LIKELY THAT MY CONTINUING TO DRIVE THE VEHICLE DAILY WITH THE FRACTURED WINDOW IS A SIGNIFICANT SAFETY HAZARD.